American Heart Association Opposes Beverage Industry Lawsuit Against Santa Cruz Sugary Drink Tax
TL;DR
The American Beverage Association's lawsuit against Santa Cruz's sugary drink tax could set a precedent for similar taxes nationwide, affecting industry profits and public health initiatives.
Santa Cruz implemented a two cents per fluid ounce tax on sugary beverages, effective May 1, 2025, following voter approval in November 2024, now challenged in court.
The sugary drink tax in Santa Cruz aims to reduce health care costs and combat diseases like heart disease and diabetes, promoting a healthier community.
A legal battle unfolds as the American Beverage Association challenges Santa Cruz's new sugary drink tax, highlighting the ongoing debate over public health versus industry profits.
Found this article helpful?
Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!

The American Heart Association has voiced strong opposition to a lawsuit filed by the American Beverage Association and its allies against the city of Santa Cruz, challenging the city's recently implemented sugary drink tax. The tax, which amounts to two cents per fluid ounce on sugary beverages, was approved by voters in November 2024 and became effective on May 1. Nancy Brown, CEO of the American Heart Association, condemned the lawsuit, accusing the beverage industry of prioritizing profits over public health.
Brown highlighted the industry's history of opposing such taxes, including a secretive 2018 deal that imposed a 12-year moratorium on sugary drink taxes in California, which was later deemed unconstitutional by the courts in 2023. She praised the Santa Cruz voters for their decision to pass the tax, framing it as a victory for public health initiatives aimed at reducing the prevalence of heart disease, stroke, and Type 2 diabetes. The American Heart Association's stance underscores the ongoing battle between public health advocates and the beverage industry over the regulation of sugary drinks, which are linked to significant health care costs and adverse health outcomes.
The lawsuit represents a critical moment in the debate over public health policy and the role of local governments in addressing health epidemics. The American Heart Association's response reiterates its commitment to supporting measures that reduce sugary drink consumption, despite the beverage industry's efforts to overturn such policies through litigation. This confrontation highlights the broader implications of the sugary drink tax debate, not only for Santa Cruz but for communities nationwide grappling with the health and economic impacts of sugary beverage consumption.
The American Heart Association has consistently advocated for policies that address the health risks associated with sugary beverages, which contribute to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. The organization points to research showing that taxes on sugary drinks can reduce consumption and generate revenue for public health programs. The beverage industry's legal challenge to the Santa Cruz tax follows a pattern of opposition to similar measures across the country, creating significant legal and political hurdles for public health initiatives.
Public health experts emphasize that sugary drink taxes represent one of several evidence-based strategies to combat chronic diseases that disproportionately affect low-income communities and communities of color. The American Heart Association argues that these taxes can help address health disparities by reducing consumption of products linked to poor health outcomes. The outcome of the Santa Cruz lawsuit could influence future policy decisions in other municipalities considering similar measures, making this legal battle a pivotal moment for public health advocacy nationwide.
Curated from NewMediaWire

